![]() It’s an unnecessary film with a poor script, some horrendous cinematography and some of the worst direction within an action film that heavily relies on build-up. In conclusion, Taken 2 is by far one of the biggest downgrades in terms of quality that a franchise has ever received. It looks absolutely horrendous, and though the locations are beautiful, the film barely makes any use of them! It’s honestly heart breaking to see a place as beautiful as Istanbul wasted completely on showing the underbellies, and not using any of the major areas for some big set pieces. Now on the topic of things that fall short, the cinematography is absolutely busted in this film. Rade Å erbedžija as the villain also gives a captivating performance, though the writing for his character falls very short. Liam Neeson, Maggie Grace and Famke Janssen all give decent performances, and while they aren’t that amazing, they serve the film quite well. The one aspect that I do like is the performances, which are as good as you could expect. It’s kind of random, but it’s a revenge story from his point of view. Yugoslavia actor Rade Å erbedžija was made to play the villain, who was the father of one of the people Mills kills in the original film. ![]() That’s something this film throws out, and focuses on an Albanian human trafficking war lord of sorts who can just do whatever he wants, wherever he wants. It was one of the few parts of the original film which made a lot of sense, as it’s not just one person pulling the strings but rather a whole organization of people. The part that I disliked most about this film was that they tried to include a proper villain this time, instead of just Liam Neeson against a whole system that was evil.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |